Archive for BlogHerald

How to Apply for Freelance Blogger Work (Yes, there’s a right way)

// February 15th, 2010 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

As I’ve warned you before, there are a ton of other bloggers applying for that freelance opening. In fact, the last time I was looking for a blogger, I received over 800 inquiries!

That’s a lot of noise to cut through. There are several tactics you can employ to help increase your odds of landing a freelance blogging gig. Here are a few that have worked for me. Follow them and you might grab that next gig right out of my hands!

- THE HIRING AGENT IS BUSY, VERY BUSY.
In my experience, the folks making hiring decisions for blogs and/or blog networks are busy. They normally wear multiple hats and are subjected to more Web noise then the average person. Unlike typical Human Resources professionals, these people are not trained to hire/fire. Therefore, you must approach them differently. That means no long cover letter or resume attachment.

- PLAY WITH THE SUBJECT LINE. Much like e-commerce campaigns, your first goal is to get the individual to open the e-mail – a major challenge in itself. Your subject line should be concise, descriptive, and unique. If there is a default subject line when filling out a form or clicking an e-mail link – change it. If a job asks you to list the title of the job in the subject line, do so, but put your own spin either before or after the requested information.

- GET THEM TO THE CONTENT. If you are applying to be a blogger, the hiring agent will be most interested in examples of your previous work. If you include a link to past posts, be sure that it is obvious that the post belongs to you when they land on the page. You want to avoid giving the employer any extra work to do. If they have to hunt for answers, they’ll likely just move on to a different applicant. I recommend using a link shortening service. It keeps the e-mail free of long URL’s and it lets you know if the employer actually viewed the page.

I also recommend that you copy and paste your strongest writing sample at the bottom of the e-mail after your closing/signature. People can be wary of clicking links from strangers. Plus you’ll combat a potential broken link.

- TIME IT RIGHT.
This one is out of your control, but the bulk of applicants will apply for the freelance blogging job within the first few days that it’s posted. Based on sheer volume, you are likely to get lost in the shuffle. Applying for a job after it has been posted for at least a week might give you a better chance of getting the hiring agent’s attention. Also, I’m a big believer that the first people to apply come across as ‘job board patrollers.’ To me that means they are not interested in a specific job – but any job. And in my world, that takes you out of the running.

- BANK ON BEING GOOGLED.
Just accept the fact that an employer will plug your name into a major search engine. It’s your job to make sure that every Tweet, picture and post makes you a desirable employee. Use common sense!

Share your success stories below! How did you land that freelance blogging gig?

Are My Blog and I Breaking Up?

// February 15th, 2010 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

They come in short spurts and are unannounced; even I am unaware they are about to occur. I’m speaking of blogging blackouts, periods of time where some unknown force keeps me from blogging. Has is it ever happened to you?

These stretches of time find me allergic to the keyboard. I suddenly don’t have much to say, and that my (temporary) preference for real-life interaction outweighs the desire to write.

If might be my post-Super Bowl hangover, but I think these periods are happening with greater frequency, and I’m not sure what to make of it. I can only compare it to an old high school girlfriend. It starts out hot and heavy. You guys spend every waking moment together. Next thing you know, you take a “weekend for yourself.” That’s usually followed by ONLY seeing each other on the weekends. Then every other weekend. And then, of course, the imminent breakup looms over your head for several weeks…at least until someone has the courage to step up and call it off.

In most cases, the boyfriend or girlfriend will move on to another person to date. But if I am getting tired of ‘dating’ blogging, who should I move on to? Does blogging have a sexier cousin I should know about?

The thing I find ironic is that these blogging blackouts always come at a time when I NEED the extra income. At a time when I am relying on blogging to open up new doors. Perhaps I am putting too much pressure on myself. Blogging wants a ring and I’m not ready to take the plunge.

So how’s your blog dating going? Please tell me I’m not the only one with trouble in paradise.

More Changes at B5Media: Chad Randall Fired?

// August 21st, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

b5mediaceoIn an unconfirmed lead Duncan Riley, Blog Herald founder and b5media co-founder, reports that Chad Randall and B5Media have parted company and Randall went MIA.

Chad Randall, Vice President (Sales) for b5media is no longer with the company, The Inquisitr has learned and confirmed through an online source.

The circumstances behind his departure though have not been disclosed. What we do know is that at the time of writing Randall has not been replaced, and we are unable to find the position advertised online either at the b5media blog, or through an extensive Google search.

Without 100% certainty, the evidence points to Randall being put off unexpectedly. He’s removed b5media as his current job on LinkedIn, he hasn’t replaced it with a new job. He’s also disappeared online, not updating his Twitter account or blogs since he left the company; that’s more significant than it sounds because one of Randall’s blogs is dedicated to Twitter marketing, and he’s a heavy Twitter user. If he was leaving the company for another position or on happy terms, he would have likely mentioned it somewhere publicly, but instead there is silence.

The unconfirmed news follows shortly after Jeremy Wrigth’s step down as CEO and seems to be the result of cost-cutting management and the (unconfirmed) news that the blog network might be selling off its business blogs.

Although still bound to a NDA for the ‘early b5media days’, Duncan recently went as far as speculating that VCs, who have invested more than $2m in b5media, are looking to sell the blog network.

I’m still legally restrained on talking about the early days, but there’s nothing in that paperwork that says that I can’t speculate on the company today. I don’t know the new CEO at all, but I’ve done some reasonable background reading, and I can come to only one conclusion: she was parachuted in by the VC’s to prep the company for sale. Whether she’s up to the task I don’t know, but with the three year anniversary of the first funding round coming up, both investors will undoubetedly be starting to look for an exit in the next 12-24 months.

Edit: If you’re looking for awesome ‘Pop Corn material’ read this entry from January 2009, especially the comments.

Possibly Related Posts

Why Doesn’t Retweet.com Use its Own URL Shortener?

// August 21st, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

retweetcom.jpgEver since digging slightly around the retweet.com debacle I discovered the rt.nu URL Shortener. A great domain and most of all a really short URL. Perfect for Twitter you would think. So why doesn’t Retweet.com use its own shorturl service? No more a quick look to the service’s popular links is needed to understand why.

Retweet.com Shorturl service rt.nu

‘Slightly’ spammy to say the least (click the image for full-size view). This follows a really buggy (and rather slow) copycat service.

retweet.com's rather buggy

If this is what to expect from Mesiab Labs there is no competition for Tweetmeme.

Possibly Related Posts

Twitter Can’t Get Tweet Because Too Many Tweets Out There.

// August 20th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

twitter-logo.jpg‘Irony at its best’ perfectly resumes the story about Twitter’s ‘tweet’ trademark application. According to blogger Sam Johnston the microblogging compny applied for the trademark in April 2009 already and was informed about the rejection the day Twitter announced the application, 01 July 2009. This announcement followed only days after Twitter told a developer that Tweet was their trademark in a email, a story uncovered by TechCrunch:

Twitter, Inc is uncomfortable with the use of the word Tweet (our trademark) and the similarity in your UI and our own. How can we go about having you change your UI to better differentiate your offering from our own?

The reason why the application was rejected: other companies had previously applied for terms close to ‘tweet’ as Sam Johnston uncovered. Tweetmark, Cotweet and Tweetphoto are the applications which were annexed to the rejection.

Suddenly it seems as if the microblogging company is becoming the new online bully and the application for the term Retweet, almost 3 weeks after retweet.com was announced, is a perfect example of this. The @retweet account has been suspended since 13 August 2009, the day before Twitter filed application for the term ‘retweet’ (#77804841).

We can now continue our Tweet Herald plans without fear and I can change my name to Franky ‘MG’ Branckaute.

Possibly Related Posts

Retweet.com Launches, Will TweetMeme Eat It Alive?

// August 20th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

Mesiab Labs have launched Retweet.com, its TweetMeme competitor that looks more and more like a clone. Judge for yourself.

Here’s Retweet.com:

retweetcom.jpg

Looking familiar?

And here’s TweetMeme:

tweetmemecom.jpg

They are both pretty similar, albeit not identical. On the other hand, both have ripped Digg off, so what’s the big deal, right?

Well maybe the big deal is the fact that Retweet.com isn’t trying to brand itself more uniquely. That might or might not mean something. Maybe they want us to mix them up while trying to catch up to the mighty lead that TweetMeme, the Digg of tweets, or maybe they just think this is the best way to present the service?

That race might be a short one, should Twitter get its way with the phrase “retweet”. On the other hand, the microblogging service is eying “tweet” as well so that could possibly mean that TweetMeme hangs loose as well. For some reason I think Retweet.com is more in Twitter’s headlights, but maybe that’s just me reacting to what’s been written online?

Anyway, all those trademark thoughts might not mean so much. Sam Johnston has a nice post (found via Mashable) on the matter. In short, if you follow his reasoning, the idea that “tweet” might be trademarked by Twitter isn’t likely to happen. The same should apply to “retweet”, meaning that Retweet.com might be in the clear.

Three things strike me:

  • Will Retweet.com be able turn all those big heavy blogs already having implementet the TweetMeme button around to its server? There needs to be money and gains involved for that to happen, and the chance of winning $10,000 isn’t likely to do the trick with these giants.
  • If Twitter should be able to trademark “retweet” and “tweet”, is Retweet.com more exposed to cease and desists than TweetMeme? I would think so. And don’t forget, the @retweet Twitter account is suspended.
  • What will happen if Twitter gets serious about retweets? They are working on it, and that might mean the end of both services, although not very likely in my opinion. But think about it, a pumped up Twitter with retweet exposure, why not push that rather than TweetMeme or Retweet.com?

What do you think, does Retweet.com stand a chance at all?

Possibly Related Posts

Employers getting tough on social network use at work

// August 19th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

facebook-logo-1In statistics which hardly surprise, given the number of problems employees have caused for themselves on Facebook and Twitter recently, employees are cracking down on the use of social networks in the workplace.

ScanSafe’s latest analysis of over a billion web sites discovered that over three-quarters of companies now block social networking sites — up 20% in the last six months.

As well as the supposed benefit in productivity from blocking non-work sites that can sap employee time (though a blanket ban may be counter-productive and a restricted hours policy might be better for morale) there’s also the reduced risk of malware creeping into a company’s systems, as well as saved bandwidth.

“Social networking sites can expose businesses to malware and if not used for business purposes can be a drain on productivity and bandwidth,” said ScanSafe’s director of product management, Spencer Parker. “Given the option, companies are increasingly taking a sterner approach to the sites that their employees are allowed to access. I imagine before long, social networking will be up there with pornography in terms of categories blocked.”

It’s a fine balancing act. Some companies are using social networks for business purposes, but where is the line drawn?

Does a blanket ban actually sap employee productivity? Might it be better to allow the use of Facebook et al during lunchtime rather than not at all?

What do you think? Facebook at work, or not?

Possibly Related Posts

Disqus 3 Teaser Video

// August 19th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

Thanks for everyone that sent this in, from the Disqus 3 teaser site, embedded below for your viewing pleasure:

Disqus is obviously one of those comment hosts that can take care of your site’s comments. A lot of sites swear by it, and we are considering switching to it here on the Blog Herald as well.

Possibly Related Posts

Which URL Shortener Should You Rely On?

// August 19th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

Picking the right URL shortener for your links is obviously important, especially now that the fact that they might not be around for as long as you might like has dawned on people. Naturally you should roll your own, but failing that, it might be interesting to know that Bit.ly and Ow.ly are the most reliable ones. At least according to a reliability report from Pingdom. I must say, I was a bit surprised to see Ow.ly up on top, it has had some downtime in the past but have obviously got its act together. In fact, it was the only one with 100% uptime.

Be sure to read the whole thing. It is pretty interesting after all.

Possibly Related Posts

Copyright, Jurisdiction and You

// August 11th, 2009 // No Comments » // BlogHerald

In copyright law, the big news is always made by cases such as the Jammie Thomas verdict, the Tenenbaum trial or even The Pirate Bay trial in Sweden. As importance as these cases are, their legal applicability to the average person is dubious, especially since the RIAA has stopped suing file sharers.

For the cases that could have a direct impact on your life, you often have to dig deeper. This is true for the case of Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon, a seemingly dull case about two law firms in a dispute over content posted on their respective Web sites.

However a recent decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case, if upheld by other circuits or the Supreme Court, could have a drastic impact on the way copyright issues are litigated in the United States.

How big is the difference? The dissenting judge on the panel said the following, “Under the majority’s opinion, every website operator faces the potential that he will be hailed into far-away courts based upon allegations of intellectual property infringement, if he happens to know where the alleged owner of the property rights resides.”

In short, if you are accused of copyright infringement, it is no longer safe to assume that you would be sued in your own district, but rather that you could be forced to litigate in the plaintiff’s court, enduring the extra costs and expense that comes with it.

Background

Brayton Purcell is a large law firm based near San Francisco. Recordon & Recordon is a two-person firm from San Jose. According to Brayton, Recordon plagiarized content from their site that pertained to its elder abuse practice. The district court agreed and ordered both Recordon and its Web design firm, Apptomix, to pay a combined $184,000 in damages and legal fees.

However, the case was unusual in that Brayton had sued Recordon in the Nothern District of California. Recordon, being in the southern part of the state, is in the Southern District. The district court had allowed the case to go forward, finding that the Northern District had jurisdiction but Recordon appealed to the 9th Circuit on jurisdictional grounds and, in a split decision, the Appeals Court found that Brayton had met its burden on the matter of jurisdiction.

According to the majority opinion, Recordon had “expressly aimed” their actions at the Northern District by choosing a site from that district to plagiarize. This means that, since the company was aware that they were using content from a company within that district, they had given that district jurisdiction over the matter, even though it is over eight hours away from the court and had no business in that district.

Implications

The issue was a fairly minor one in the case itself. If the 9th Circuit had tossed out the ruling on jurisdictional grounds, most likely Brayton would have simply filed in the Southern District with much the same results. It would have been more about delaying the ruling and negotiating a settlement than winning the case.

However, if the ruling stands over time, it could have a drastic impact in future copyright cases.

As Judge Stephen Reinhardt, it’s conceivable that, should this ruling stand up over time, that by infringing someone’s copyright and knowing where that person is located, you’ve done enough to give that person’s local district jurisdiction over the matter. It’s conceivable that you could see yourself defending a copyright dispute across the country, bearing the expense of doing so.

This would have the effect of making it much cheaper and easier to file a lawsuit for copyright infringement and make it much more difficult, or even impossible, to defend. It would almost certainly increase the number of lawsuits filed and make it much easier to obtain a settlement in those cases. While this could be a boon for smaller copyright holders, who often lack the resources to file cross-country lawsuits, it could also be a nightmare for alleged infringers, especially if it is abused.

At this time, this ruling only directly applies to the 9th Circuit. However, it and the 2nd Circuit, which overs New York state and some of the surrounding areas, are considered the major copyright circuits and make up the bulk of precedent on these matters.

Still, this does not mean that you can expect to be sued in random districts all over the country just yet. Since the issue is far from settled, and likely won’t be until either other circuits or the Supreme Court weigh in, most won’t risk having a suit tossed on jurisdictional grounds as it is usually cheaper and easier to file it correctly the first time. Even the 9th Circuit could reverse itself if a different panel of judges were to take up the issue.

In the meantime though, it is even more imperative to not infringe copyright or, if you do, at least not be aware of where the person you are infringing from is located.

Bottom Line

The punchline to this very sad joke is that, according to Recordon, the entire infringement was carried out by Apptomix. They were not aware of the infringement and only found out about the existence of Brayton after the dispute began.

Stephen Recordon, one of the partners at Recordon & Recordon, said, “Years of litigation, thousands and thousands of dollars, and all because you hire the wrong person.”

But while the case is definitely a big blow to Recordon, it could also be a major setback for countless others in the same position. Turning cases that would have been simple cease and desist letters or small settlements into expensive lawsuits in far-flung districts.

Right now that’s only a possibility, but the groundwork has definitely been laid.

Possibly Related Posts